L'ALTERNATIVE |
||
---|---|---|
SOLIDARITE |
||
L'ALTERNATIVE
CONTRE LE RACISME ET L'APARTHEIDPOUR LE RESPECT |
Voir aussi : CONTRE LE SIONISMELe Conseil des droits de l'Homme de l'ONU compare l'attitude de l'Etat juif dans les territoires palestiniens à l'Apartheid GENEVE (AP) - 22/2/7 - Le Conseil des droits de l'Homme de l'ONU compare jeudi les actions d'Israël dans les territoires palestiniens à l'Apartheid, un parallèle qui a entraîné la colère de l'Etat hébreu [juif]. Le rapport de John Dugard, un enquêteur indépendant sur le conflit israélo-palestinien pour le Conseil, doit présenter le document le mois prochain, mais il a été diffusé sur le site Internet de l'agence. L'avocat sud-africain, qui avait lutté contre l'Apartheid dans les années 1980, estime que "les pratiques d'Israël dans les (territoires palestiniens) ressemblent à des aspects de l'Apartheid". Le rapport de 24 pages énumère plusieurs accusations contre l'Etat hébreu, allant des restrictions de déplacements aux démolitions de maisons, en passant par des traitements préférentiels pour les colons installés en Cisjordanie et dans la Bande de Gaza. "Peut-on sérieusement démentir que l'objectif d'une telle action est d'établir et de maintenir la domination d'un groupe racial, les juifs, sur un autre groupe racial, les Palestiniens, et de les opprimer systématiquement ?", interroge l'enquêteur. L'ambassadeur d'Israël à Genève a accusé John Dugard de diriger ses attaques uniquement vers l'Etat hébreu. "Toute conclusion qu'il peut tirer est donc (...) partiale", a souligné Yitzhak Levanon. Le Conseil des droits de l'Homme a essuyé de nombreuses critiques, y compris de son fondateur, l'ancien secrétaire général de l'ONU Kofi Anna, pour avoir concentré ses attaques contre un seul pays, Israël. John Dugard a été nommé expert en 2001 par l'ancienne Commission des droits de l'Homme pour enquêter uniquement sur les violations commises du côté israélien. |
Résolution 3379 de l'Assemblée générale de l'ONU (10 novembre 1975) : Source : http://www.alterinfo.net (29 Novembre 2007)
L'Assemblée générale, |
Another small indignity at an Israeli checkpoint by Jonathan Cook Source : antiwar.com 24/2/7 - The scene : a military checkpoint deep in Palestinian territory in the West Bank. A tall, thin elderly man, walking stick in hand, makes a detour past the line of Palestinians, many of them young men, waiting obediently behind concrete barriers for permission from an Israeli soldier to leave one Palestinian area, the city of Nablus, to enter another Palestinian area, the neighboring village of Huwara. The long queue is moving slowly, the soldier taking his time to check each person's papers. The old man heads off purposefully down a parallel but empty lane reserved for vehicle inspections. A young soldier controlling the human traffic spots him and orders him back in line. The old man stops, fixes the soldier with a stare and refuses. The soldier looks startled, and uncomfortable at the unexpected show of defiance. He tells the old man more gently to go back to the queue. The old man stands his ground. After a few tense moments, the soldier relents and the old man passes. Is the confrontation revealing of the soldier's humanity? That is not the way it looks – or feels – to the young Palestinians penned in behind the concrete barriers. They can only watch the scene in silence. None would dare to address the soldier in the manner the old man did – or take his side had the Israeli been of a different disposition. An old man is unlikely to be detained or beaten at a checkpoint. Who, after all, would believe he attacked or threatened a soldier, or resisted arrest, or was carrying a weapon? But the young men know their own injuries or arrests would barely merit a line in Israel's newspapers, let alone an investigation. And so, the checkpoints have made potential warriors of Palestine's grandfathers at the price of emasculating their sons and grandsons. I observed this small indignity – such humiliations are now a staple of life for any Palestinian who needs to move around the West Bank – during a shift with Machsom Watch. The grass-roots organization founded by Israeli women in 2001 monitors the behavior of soldiers at a few dozen of the more accessible checkpoints ("machsom" in Hebrew). The checkpoints came to dominate Palestinian life in the West Bank (and, before the disengagement, in Gaza too) long before the outbreak of the second intifada in late 2000, and even before the first Palestinian suicide bombings. They were Israel's response to the Oslo accords, which created a Palestinian Authority to govern limited areas of the occupied territories. Israel began restricting Palestinians allowed to work in Israel to those issued with exit permits; a system enforced through a growing network of military roadblocks. Soon the checkpoints were also restricting movement inside the occupied territories, ostensibly to protect the Jewish settlements built in occupied territory. By late last year, according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 528 checkpoints and roadblocks were recorded in the West Bank, choking its roads every few miles. Israel's daily Haaretz newspaper puts the figure even higher: in January there were 75 permanently manned checkpoints, some 150 mobile checkpoints, and more than 400 places where roads have been blocked by obstacles. All these restrictions on movement for a place that is, according to the CIA's World Factbook, smaller than the tiny US state of Delaware. As a result, moving goods and people from one place to the next in the West Bank has become a nightmare of logistics and costly delays. At the checkpoints, food spoils, patients die, and children are prevented from reaching their schools. The World Bank blames the checkpoints and roadblocks for strangling the Palestinian economy. Embarrassed by recent publicity about the burgeoning number of checkpoints, the Israeli prime minister, Ehud Olmert, promised the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, in December that there would be an easing of travel restrictions in the West Bank – to little effect, according to reports in the Israeli media. Although the army announced last month that 44 earth barriers had been removed in fulfilment of Olmert's pledge, it later emerged that none of the roadblocks had actually been there in the first place. Contrary to the impression of most observers, the great majority of the checkpoints are not even near the Green Line, Israel's internationally recognized border until it occupied the West Bank and Gaza in 1967. Some are so deep inside Palestinian territory that the army refuses to allow Machsom Watch to visit them. There, the women say, no one knows what abuses are being perpetrated unseen on Palestinians. But at Huwara checkpoint, where the old man refused to submit, the soldiers know that most of the time they are being watched by fellow Israelis and that their behavior is being recorded in monthly logs. Machsom Watch has a history of publishing embarrassing photographs and videos of the soldiers' actions. It showed, for example, a videotape in 2004 of a young Palestinian man being forced to play his violin at Beit Iba checkpoint, a story that gained worldwide attention because it echoed the indignities suffered by Jews at the hands of the Nazis. Machsom Watch has about 500 members, reportedly including Olmert's leftwing daughter, Dana. But only about 200 actively take part in checkpoint duties, an experience that has left many outspoken in denouncing the occupation. The organization is widely seen by the Israeli public as extremist, with pro-Israel groups accusing the women of "demonizing" Israel. It is the kind of criticism painfully familiar to Nomi Lalo, from Kfar Sava. A veteran of Machsom Watch, she is the mother of three children, two of whom have already served in the army while the youngest, aged 17, is due to join up later this year. "He has been more exposed to my experiences in Machsom Watch and has some sympathy with my point of view," she says. "But my oldest son has been very hostile about my activities. It has caused a lot of tension in the family." Most of the women do shifts at a single checkpoint, but I join Nomi on "mobile" duty in the central region, moving between the dozens of checkpoints west of Nablus. She wants to start by showing me the separate road system in the West Bank, with unrestricted and high-quality roads set aside for Jewish settlers living illegally in occupied territory while Palestinians are forced to make difficult and lengthy journeys over hills and through valleys on what are often little more than dirt tracks. Machsom Watch calls this "apartheid," a judgment shared by the liberal daily Haaretz newspaper, which recently wrote an editorial that Israeli parents ought to "be very worried about their country sending their sons and daughters on an apartheid mission: to restrict Palestinian mobility within the occupied territory … in order to enable Jews to move freely." We leave the small Palestinian town of Azzoun, close by the city of Qalqilya, and head directly north towards another city, Tulkarm. A trip that should take little more than a quarter of an hour is now all but impossible for most Palestinians. "This road is virtually empty, even though it is the main route between two of the West Bank's largest cities," Nomi points out. "That is because most Palestinians cannot get the permits they need to use these roads. Without a permit they can't get through the checkpoints, so either they stay in their villages or they have to seek circuitous and dangerous routes off the main roads." We soon reach one of the checkpoints Nomi is talking about. At Aras, two soldiers sit in a small concrete bunker in the center of the main junction between Tulkarm and Nablus. The bored soldiers are killing time waiting for the next car and the driver whose papers they will need to inspect. A young Palestinian man, in woollen cap to protect him from the cold, stands by a telegraph post close by the junction. Bilal, aged 26, has been "detained" at the same spot for three hours by the soldiers. Nervously he tells us that he is trying to reach his ill father in hospital in Tulkarm. Nomi looks unconvinced and, after a talk with the soldiers and calls on her mobile phone to their commanders, she has a clearer picture. "He has been working illegally in Israel and they have caught him trying to get back to his home in the West Bank. The soldiers are holding him here to punish him. They could imprison him but, given the dire state of the Palestinian economy, the Israeli prisons would soon be overflowing with jobseekers. So holding him here all day is a way of making him suffer. It's illegal but, unless someone from Machsom Watch turns up, who will ever know?" Is it not good that the military commanders are willing to talk to her? "They know we can present their activities in the West Bank in a very harsh light and so they cooperate. They don't want bad publicity. I never forget that when I am speaking to them. When they are being helpful, I remind myself their primary motive is to protect the occupation's image." Nomi sees proof in cases like Bilal's that the checkpoints and Israel's steel and concrete barrier in the West Bank – or fence, as she calls it – are not working in the way Israel claims. "First, the fence is built on Palestinian land, not on the Green Line, and it cuts Palestinians off from their farmland and their chances of employment. It forces them to try to get into Israel to work. It is self-defeating. "And second, thousands of Palestinians like Bilal reach Israel from the West Bank each day in search of work. Any one of them could be a suicide bomber. The fence simply isn't effective in terms of stopping them. If Palestinians who are determined enough to work in Israel can avoid the checkpoints, those who want to attack Israel can certainly avoid them. No one straps a bomb on and marches up to a checkpoint. It is ordinary Palestinians who suffer instead." The other day, says Nomi, she found a professor of English from Bir Zeit University held at this checkpoint, just like Bilal. He had tried to sneak out of Tulkarm during a curfew to teach a class at the university near the city of Ramallah, some 40km south of here. Nomi's intervention eventually got him released. "He was sent back to Tulkarm. He thanked me profusely, but really what did we do for him or his students? We certainly didn't get him to the university." After Nomi's round of calls, Bilal is called over by one of the soldiers. Wagging his finger reprovingly, the soldier lectures Bilal for several minutes before sending him on his way with a dismissive wave of the hand. Another small indignity. As we leave, Nomi receives a call from a Machsom Watch group at Jitt checkpoint, a few miles away. The team of women say that, when they turned up to begin their shift, the soldiers punished the Palestinians by shutting the checkpoint. The women are panicking because a tailback of cars – mainly taxis and trucks driven by Palestinians with special permits – is building. After some discussion with Nomi, it is decided that the women should leave. We head uphill to another checkpoint, some 500 metres from Aras, guarding the entrance to Jabara, a village whose educated population include many teachers and school inspectors. Today, however, the villagers are among several thousand Palestinians living in a legal twilight zone, trapped on the Israeli side of the wall. Cut off from the rest of the West Bank, the villagers are not allowed to receive guests and need special permits to reach the schools where they work. (An additional quarter of a million Palestinians are sealed off from both Israel and the West Bank in their own ghettoes.) "Children who have married out of Jabara are not even allowed to visit their parents here," says Nomi. "Family life has been torn apart, with people unable to attend funerals and weddings. I cannot imagine what it is like for them. The Supreme Court has demanded the fence be moved but the state says it does not have the money for the time being to make the changes." Jabara's children have a checkpoint named after them which they have to pass through each day to reach their schools nearby in the West Bank. At the far end of Jabara we have to pass through a locked gate to leave the village. There we are greeted by yet another checkpoint, this one closer to the Green Line on a road the settlers use to reach Israel. It is one of a growing number that look suspiciously like border crossings, even though they are not on the Green Line, with special booths and lanes for the soldiers to inspect vehicles. The soldiers see our yellow number plate, distinguishing us from the green plates of the Palestinians, and wave us through. Nomi is using a settlers' map she bought from a petrol station inside Israel to navigate our way to the next checkpoint, Anabta, close by an isolated settlement called Enav. Although this was once a busy main road, the checkpoint is empty and the soldiers mill around with nothing to do. An old Palestinian man wearing the black and white keffiyah (head scarf) popularized by Yasser Arafat approaches them selling socks. There are no detained Palestinians, so we move on. Nomi is as skeptical of claims she hears in the Israeli media about the checkpoints foiling suicide attacks as she is about the army's claims that they have been removing the roadblocks. "I spend all day monitoring a checkpoint and come home in the evening, turn on the TV and hear that four suicide bombers were caught at the checkpoint where I have been working. It happens just too often. I stopped believing the army a long time ago." We arrive at another settlement, comprising a couple of dozen Jewish families, called Shavei Shomron. It is located next to Road 60, once the main route between Nablus and the most northernly Palestinian city, Jenin. Today the road is empty as it leads nowhere; it has been blocked by the army, supposedly to protect Shomron. "Palestinians have to drive for hours across country to reach Jenin just because a handful of settlers want to live here by the main road," observes Nomi. A short distance away, also on Road 60, is one of the larger and busier checkpoints: Beit Iba, the site where the Palestinian was forced to play his violin. A few kilometres west of Nablus, the checkpoint has been built in the most unlikely of places, a working quarry that has covered the area in a fine white dust. "I look at this place and think the army at least has a sense of humor," Nomi says. Yellow Palestinian taxis are waiting at one end of the quarry to pick up Palestinians allowed to leave Nablus on foot through the checkpoint. At the vehicle inspection point, a donkey and cart stacked so high with boxes of medicines that they look permanently on the verge of tipping over is being checked alongside ambulances and trucks. Close by is the familiar corridor of metal gates, turnstiles and concrete barriers through which Palestinians must pass one at a time to be inspected. On a battered table, a young man is emptying the contents of his small suitcase, presumably after a stay in Nablus. He is made to hold up his packed underwear in front of the soldiers and the Palestinian onlookers. Another small indignity. Here at least the Palestinians wait under a metal awning that protects from the sun and rain. "The roof and the table are our doing," says Nomi. "Before the Palestinians had to empty their bags on to the ground." Machsom Watch is also responsible for a small Portakabin office nearby, up a narrow flight of concrete steps, with the ostentatious sign "Humanitarian Post" by the door. "After we complained about women with babies being made to wait for hours in line, the army put up this cabin with baby changing facilities, diapers and formula milk. Then they invited the media to come and film it." The experiment was short-lived apparently. After two weeks the army claimed the Palestinians were not using the post and removed the facilities. I go up and take a look. It's entirely bare: just four walls and a very dusty basin. How effective does she feel Machsom Watch is? Does it really help the Palestinians or merely add a veneer of legitimacy to the checkpoints by suggesting, like the humanitarian post, that Israel cares about its occupied subjects? It is, Nomi admits, a question that troubles her a great deal. "It's a dilemma. The Palestinians here used to have to queue under the sun without shelter or water. Now that we have got them a roof, maybe we have made the occupation look a little more humane, a little more acceptable. There are some women who argue we should only watch, and not interfere, even if we see Palestinians being abused or beaten." Which happens, as Machsom Watch's monthly reports document in detail. Even the Israeli media is starting to report uncomfortably about the soldiers' behavior, from assaults to soldiers urinating in front of religious women. At Beit Iba in October, says Nomi, a Palestinian youngster was badly beaten by Israeli soldiers after he panicked in the queue and shinned up a pole shouting that he couldn't breath. Haaretz later reported that the soldiers beat him with their rifle butts and smashed his glasses. He was then thrown in a detention cell at the checkpoint. And in November, Haitem Yassin, aged 25, made the mistake of arguing with a soldier at a small checkpoint near Beit Iba called Asira al-Shamalia. He was upset when the soldiers forced the religious women he was sharing a taxi with to pat their bodies as a security measure. According to Amira Hass, a veteran Israeli reporter, Yassin was then shoved by one of the soldiers and pushed back. In the ensuing scuffle, Yassin was shot in the stomach. He was then handcuffed and beaten with rifle butts while other soldiers blocked an ambulance from coming to his aid. Yassin remained unconscious for several days. We leave Beit Iba and within a few minutes we are at another roadblock, at Jitt. This is where the soldiers shut the checkpoint to traffic when the Machsom Watch team showed up earlier. Nomi wants to talk to them. We park some distance away, behind the queue of Palestinian cars, and she walks towards them. There is a brief discussion and she is back. Meanwhile, one of the soldiers takes out a megaphone and calls to the taxi driver at the front of the queue. He is told to leave his car at the wait sign and approach the checkpoint 100 meters away on foot. "They are not happy. Now they are punishing the drivers because I have turned up. It's exactly the same response as this morning." Nomi decides Machsom Watch should retreat again. We leave as the queue of cars starts to build up. The notorious Huwara checkpoint, guarding the main road to Nablus from the south, is our next destination. Early in the intifada, there were regular stories of soldiers abusing Palestinians here. Today, Machsom Watch has an almost permanent presence here, as do army officers concerned about bad publicity. It is a surreal scene. We are deep in the West Bank, with Palestinians everywhere, but two young Jews – sporting a hippy look fashionable among the more extreme religious settlers – are lounging by the side of the road waiting for a lift to take them to one of the more militant settlements that encircle Nablus. A soldier, there to protect them, stands chatting. "There used to be a taxi rank here waiting for Palestinians as they came through the checkpoint," says Nomi, "but it has been moved much further away so the settlers have a safer pickup point. The convenience of the settlers means that each day thousands of Palestinians, including pregnant women and the disabled, must walk more than an extra hundred yards to reach the taxis." As I am photographing the checkpoint, a soldier wearing red-brown boots – the sign of a paratrooper, according to Nomi – confronts me, warning that he will confiscate my camera. Nomi knows her, and my, rights and asks him by what authority he is making such a threat. They argue in Hebrew for a few minutes before he apologizes, saying he mistook me for a Palestinian. "Are only Palestinians not allowed to photograph the checkpoints?" Nomi scolds him, adding as an afterthought: "Didn't you hear that modern mobile phones have cameras? How can you stop a checkpoint being photographed?" The pleasant face of Huwara is Micha, an officer from the District Coordination Office who oversees the soldiers. When he shows up in his car, Nomi engages him in conversation. Micha tells us that yesterday a teenager was stopped at the checkpoint carrying a knife and bomb-making equipment. Nomi scoffs, much to Micha's annoyance. "Why is it always teenagers being stopped at the checkpoints ?" she asks him. "You know as well as I do that the Shin Bet [Israel's domestic security service] puts these youngsters up to it to justify the checkpoints' existence. Why would anyone leave Nablus with a knife and bring it to Huwara checkpoint? For God's sake, you can buy swords on the other side of the checkpoint, in Huwara village." We leave Huwara and go deeper into the West Bank, along a "sterile road" – army parlance for one the Palestinians cannot use – that today services settlers reaching Elon Moreh and Itimar. Once Palestinians travelled the road to the village of Beit Furik but not anymore. "Israel does not put up signs telling you that two road systems exist here. Instead it is the responsibility of Palestinians to know that they cannot drive on this road. Any that make a mistake are arrested." South-east of Nablus we pass the village of Beit Furik itself, the entrance to which has a large metal gate that can be lock by the army at will. A short distance on and we reach Beit Furik checkpoint and beyond it, tantalizingly in view, the grey cinderblock homes of the city of Nablus. Again, when I try to take a photo, a soldier storms towards me barely concealing his anger. Nomi remonstrates with him, but he is in a foul mood. Away from him, she confides: "They know that these checkpoints violate international law and that they are complict in war crimes. Many of the soldiers are scared of being photographed." Faced with the hostile soldier, we soon abandon Beit Furik and head back to Huwara. Less than a minute on from Huwara (Nomi makes me check my watch), we have hit another checkpoint: Yitzhar. A snarl-up of taxis, trucks and a few private cars is blocking the Palestinian inspection lane. We overtake the queue in a separate lane reserved for cars with yellow plates (settlers) and reach the other side of the checkpoint. There we find a taxi driver waiting by the side of the road next to his yellow cab. Faek has been there for 90 minutes after an Israeli policeman confiscated both his ID and his driving licence, and then disappeared with them. Did Faek get the name of the policeman? No, he replies. "Of course not," admits Nomi. "What Palestinian would risk asking an Israeli official for his name ?" Nomi makes some more calls and is told that Faek can come to the police station in the nearby settlement of Ariel to collect his papers. But, in truth, Faek is trapped. He cannot get through the checkpoints separating him from Ariel without his ID card. And even if he could find a tortuous route around the checkpoints, he could still be arrested for not having a licence and issued a fine of a few hundred shekels, a small sum for Israelis but one he would struggle to pay. So quietly he carries on waiting in the hope that the policeman will return. Nomi is not hopeful. "It is illegal to take his papers without giving him a receipt but this kind of thing happens all the time. What can the Palestinians do ? They dare not argue. It's the Wild West out here." Some time later, as the sun lowers in the sky and a chill wind picks up, Faek is still waiting. Nomi's shift is coming to an end and we must head back to Israel. She promises to continue putting pressure by phone on the police to return his documents. Nearly two hours later, as I arrive home, Faek unexpectedly calls, saying he has finally got his papers back. But he is still not happy : he has been issued with a fine of 500 shekels ($115) by the police. Nomi's phone is busy, he says. Can I help get the fine reduced ? |
Inscriptions xénophobes et croix gammées sur la mosquée de Castres
|
Hortefeux : le bon et le mauvais racisme
|
Une pétition pour mettre fin au débat sur l'identité nationale
|
Le ministre de l'Intérieur et ancien ministre de l'Immigration, Brice Hortefeux,
|
—
Pétition adressée aux Pouvoirs publics :27/12/2013Dissoudre la LICRA (Ligue Contre le Racisme et l'Antisémitisme) *
La LICRA, Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l'Antisémitisme, au contraire de lutter contre ces idéologies fascistes qui portent atteinte à la notion même de la Nation, comme à celle d'Humanité, la LICRA, par ses actes est un trouble à l'ordre public perpétuel, perfide, et nocif au possible aux valeurs fondamentales garanties par les lois de la République, le venin despotique que ses dirigeants et membres veulent insuffler dans la veine démocratique, au profit de l'hégémonie esclavagiste américano-sioniste, imposée au peuple au niveau planétaire sous l'intitulé revendiqué du «Nouvel ordre mondial». Et pour ce faire, la LICRA invoque toujours un trouble à l'ordre public qu'en fait, à chaque fois, méthodiquement et à cette fin pernicieuse, elle a elle-même généré. Pour toutes ces raisons, trouble à l'ordre public incessant et systématique, incitations répétées à la haine, entraves revendiquées au droit constitutionnel des comédiens et artistes d'exercer leur travail, atteintes à la liberté d'expression, et même, dernièrement, incitations à commettre des délits, voire des crimes, nous, citoyens de France de tous horizons, origines, confessions et courants politiques réunis en la présente pétition, nous demandons aux pouvoirs publics d'ordonner la dissolution de la LICRA, association loi 1901, Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l'Antisémitisme.
Pour signer la pétition, aller à change.org
* Pour la remplacer par la Ligue Contre le Racisme et l'Apartheid ? |
Un élu israélien proclame la suprématie de la «race juive»Sputnik - 14-6-18 - Un député du parti au pouvoir en Israël Likoud a déclaré mercredi que la «race juive» était la plus intelligente du monde et possédait le «capital humain le plus élevé», parce que, selon lui, le public israélien ne gobait pas les accusations de corruption contre le Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahu. «La race juive représente le capital humain le plus élevé, le plus intelligent, le plus compréhensif» [sic], voici des affirmations du député israélien Miki Zohar qui a tenté ainsi de soutenir le Premier ministre israélien entraîné dans une enquête de corruption, écrit The Times of Israel. L'élu du Likoud, le parti au pouvoir en Israël, a fait ces commentaires lors d'un débat radio avec le journaliste politique Dan Margalit portant sur les enquêtes de corruption, dans le cadre desquelles le Premier ministre israélien serait soit un suspect, soit un témoin. Citant de récents sondages qui montrent que M.Netanyahu jouissait d'un fort soutien malgré trois enquêtes contre lui, l'élu du Likoud affirme que les médias n'ont pas convaincu le public israélien que le Premier ministre était incapable de diriger le pays. «Je peux vous dire quelque chose de très simple», a déclaré le parlementaire lors du débat sur Radio 103FM. «Vous ne pouvez pas tromper les Juifs, peu importe ce que les médias ont écrit. Le public en Israël est un public qui appartient à la race juive, et toute la race juive représente le capital humain le plus élevé, le plus intelligent, le plus compréhensif. Le public sait ce que le Premier ministre fait pour le pays et à quel point il est excellent dans son travail». Ces affirmations ont conduit à une dispute sur Twitter avec Ahmad Tibi, du parti de la Liste unifiée, qui provoque souvent l'ire d'autres élus en raison de leur soutien ouvert aux Palestiniens. En réponse aux déclarations sur la «suprématie des Juifs», le député de la Liste unifiée a tweeté une photo de M. Zohar avec le message: «Un élu dans "l'État juif" présente : la théorie raciale.» Puis, M.Tibi a publié une photo de lui-même en lisant le livre d'Amos Elon «La pitié de tout», qui examine comment l'Holocauste a mis fin à la culture juive allemande. Zohar a répondu: «Et sur la couverture arrière il y a une photo d'Albert Einstein, un autre Juif qui a apporté de bonnes choses au monde». «Quel est le lien entre vous et Einstein?», a répliqué M.Tibi. «Ce n'est même pas une relation de parenté». Dans un entretien avec Hadashot TV news, le député du Likoud a d'abord nié avoir parlé de la suprématie de la «race juive», mais, présenté avec un enregistrement de ses commentaires précédents, a réitéré: «Le peuple juif et la race juive représente le capital humain le plus élevé qui existe» [sic]. «Que pouvez-vous faire? Nous avons été bénis par Dieu… et je continuerai à le dire à chaque occasion», a-t-il déclaré. «Je ne dois pas avoir honte du fait que le peuple juif soit le peuple élu, et comporte les personnes les plus intelligentes et les plus spéciales du monde». L'élu a encore tenu à citer de nombreuses innovations et découvertes faites par les Juifs, et a déclaré qu'Israël avait accompli plus de choses en 70 ans que certains peuples en des milliers d'années. «Vous pouvez comprendre pourquoi nous gagnons généralement beaucoup de prix Nobel», a-t-il conclu. - Source : Sputnik (Russie) |
À propos de l’actuelle campagne sioniste internationale de diffamationDéclaration de Gilad Atzmon« La criminalisation de tout discours politique et activisme hostile à Israël représente désormais l’une des plus graves menaces à la liberté d’expression en Occident » Glenn Greenwald 19.7.2017 Gilad Atzmon en février 2017 Source Wikipedia Gilad Atzmon ( né le 9 juin 1963) est un jazzman et militant antisioniste britannique, né en Israël (il a renoncé à cette nationalité) et résidant actuellement à Londres. Musicalement, il a collaboré avec Shane McGowan, Robbie Williams, Sinéad O'Connor, Robert Wyatt, Paul McCartney et le groupe Pink Floyd. Politiquement, il est un partisan affirmé de l'antisionisme, et de l'antijudaisme dans le sens particulier qu'il donne à ce terme. Il n'est pas contre la religion ni contre les gens d'origine juive mais contre les juifs qui affirment leur judéité (le fait de placer le fait d'être juif au-dessus de tous les autres traits de sa personnalité). Il pense que la judéité est une « idéologie qui mène le monde à une catastrophe et nous devons arrêter (la catastrophe) ». C'est un partisan d'Israël Shamir et Paul Eisen, des anti-sionistes et un pro-palestinien. En 2008, il considère les sionistes comme responsables du krach financier. Il est également sujet de controverses, qualifié d'antisémite par une autre partie des militants pro-palestiniens et antisionistes, il se défend de tout antisémitisme déclarant n'avoir rien contre les individus.
—————————- RéseauInternational - 18-9-18 - Tout comme le vétéran Roger Waters, vedette des Pink Floyd, et de nombreux autres artistes et penseurs du monde entier, je suis soumis à une campagne internationale de diffamation, orchestrée et promue par diverses institutions sionistes ; elles tentent de réduire au silence toute forme de légitime dissension vis-à-vis du sionisme et de la politique israélienne. Les municipalités, clubs et festivals du monde entier qui font la promotion de ma musique ou de mes réflexions sont soumis à un barrage d’e-mails, répandus dans l’intention clairement malveillante de me diffamer. Dans ces courriels, on me taxe d’« antisémite », de « fanatique », « raciste », « négationniste », etc. Évidemment, tout cela ne tient pas debout. Je suis écrivain et j’ai en effet critiqué Israël ainsi que toute autre manifestation de l’exceptionnalisme politique juif ; j’ai analysé de manière critique le sionisme, la politique juive, ainsi que l’idéologie et la politique identitaire en général. Je crois que tous les États, toutes les idéologies et toutes les politiques doivent se voir soumis à examen critique, mais jamais je n’ai critiqué les Juifs (ou quiconque d’ailleurs) en tant que peuple, race ou entité biologique. En fait, je fais un travail profondément antiraciste et m’intéresse uniquement au politique et culturel. Mise à jour : en janvier 2018, Gilad Atzmon figurait sur la liste des « cent militants, défenseurs et modèles » œuvrant pour la paix et la justice. Malheureusement, d’aucuns s’évertuent à entretenir une campagne acharnée de censure et d’autodafés des ouvrages qui leur déplaisent : nous ne devons jamais les laisser parvenir à leurs fins. Liberté intellectuelle et tolérance sont des valeurs occidentales précieuses, qu’il nous incombe de défendre à tout prix. Donc, au cas où vous ressentiriez le besoin de vous adresser à certains de ces fauteurs de haine, voici quelques points que je vous invite à prendre en compte.
– Professeur Richard Falk, Rapporteur spécial des Nations Unies sur les Droits de l’homme en Palestine « Aussi fascinant que stimulant » – John J. Mearsheimer, Professeur de sciences politiques « Atzmon a du cran – vertu tellement rare parmi les intellectuels occidentaux » – James Petras, Professeur de sociologie. « L’ouvrage de Gilad : une excellente critique de la politique identitaire en général identitaire juive en particulier, et dans une perspective humaniste » – Francis A. Boyle, Professeur de Droit international. « Au lieu de ‘Roi des Juifs’, Atzmon devrait peut-être être reconnu comme le prophète d’antan. C’est du moins ainsi qu’il se montre dans sa description de lui-même et de son champ d’action » - Marc Ellis, Professeur de théologie juive. « Un ouvrage superbe et nécessaire qui démystifie certaines vérités indéniables sur l’identité juive « – Gauden Sarasola, El Pais « Voici la contribution essentielle d’Atzmon en faveur de la solidarité avec la Palestine : aider les non-Juifs à comprendre qu’ils ne sont pas systématiquement en tort quand ils se retrouvent confrontés aux organisations juives – Jean Bricmont, Professeur de sciences « Le livre de Gilad Atzmon, Quel Juif errant ?, est aussi spirituel et provocateur que son titre. Mais c’est aussi un livre important, dont les conclusions sur les juifs, la judéité et le judaïsme risquent de choquer certains ; or, elles sont essentielles pour comprendre la politique identitaire juive ainsi que son rôle sur la scène mondiale » – Karl Sabbagh, éditeur et producteur « Gilad a le cran de s’émanciper de la claustrophobie spirituelle pour tendre vers un humanitarisme libre et ouvert » – Robert Wyatt, musicien légendaire. « C’est excellent, du début à la fin. Arguments très bien organisés et finement articulés » – Le chanteur et auteur-compositeur révolutionnaire, David Rovics « Dans son style pince-sans-rire si inimitable, Atzmon a repéré l’abcès à la dent de sagesse juive – le tribalisme d’exil – et il vient de le crever. Aïe ! » – Eric Walberg, Al Aharam Weekly « Brillante analyse, qui rend compréhensible et prévisible ce qui peut être pris pour des contradictions dans le comportement politique motivé par l’identité juive » – Jeff Blankfort, militant de la Solidarité Juive « Une œuvre fascinante » – Oren Ben Dor, Professeur de droit « Gilad Atzmon : voici quelqu’un qui sait parfaitement ce qu’être un intellectuel veut dire » – Kim Petersen, Dissident Voice Original: On The current international Zionist smear campaign Traduit par Dominique Macabies source:http://www.tlaxcala-int.org/article.asp?reference=24074 |
Photo d'illustration : David Lau, le Grand rabbin ashkénaze d’Israël A rendre Hitler jaloux ! Le Grand rabbin d’Israël impose des tests ADNAuteur : Moran Azoulay | Editeur : Walt | Jeudi, 14 Mars 2019
Le grand rabbin ashkénaze d’Israël a imposé des examens à des candidats au mariage pour « vérifier » qu’ils étaient bien « génétiquement juifs », révèle une enquête publiée par le site Ynet (version en ligne du quotidien Yediot Aharonot). Pour certaines personnes, il est même exigé que des proches parents des fiancés se soumettent eux aussi au dépistage génétique, ajoute le journal. On rappelle que le mariage civil n’existe pas dans cette grande «démocratie», et que les citoyens classés «juifs», soit la majorité des habitants, tout comme leurs homologues classés « chrétiens » ou « musulmans », doivent invariablement passer par l’autorité religieuse s’ils veulent convoler en justes noces. Le dépistage en question concerne principalement des personnes originaires de l’ex-Union Soviétique (Russes, Ukrainiens et autres). Avigdor Lieberman, le président du parti férocement anti-arabe Yisrael Beitenu (« Israël notre maison »), dont la base électorale est principalement formée de gens originaires, comme lui, de l’ex-Union Soviétique, crie au racisme, et exige la démission immédiate du grand rabbin David Lau. Au moins une vingtaine de couples se sont vus imposer de tels examens au cours de l’année écoulée par les autorités religieuses, selon un rapport récemment publié par l’Institut ITIM, une ONG dont l’objet est de venir en aide « aux personnes rencontrant des difficultés administratives avec les autorités religieuses », précise Ynet. Dans un cas, le rabbinat a exigé d’une jeune fiancée que non seulement elle subisse un prélèvement, mais que sa mère y soit également soumise, et même une de ses tantes, « pour s’assurer que la mère de la future épouse n’avait pas elle-même été une enfant adoptée » ! Il a par ailleurs été demandé à une seconde jeune femme et à sa mère de se soumettre à un examen comparatif de leur ADN mitochondrial, un test fiable pour valider une filiation mère-fille, mais sans relation avec une quelconque recherche de pseudo-judaïcité. Dans un autre cas, un homme a été mis sur la liste des « mariages différés », parce qu’il avait refusé de se soumettre au test génétique exigé par les rabbins au motif que les documents censés établir la judaïcité de sa grand-mère n’étaient pas satisfaisants. Le ministre de l’Intérieur Aryeh Deri avait dans un premier temps démenti l’existence de telles pratiques racistes. Mais le Grand rabbin Lau, lui, assume la démarche, et valide ainsi l’ignoble concept de race juive cher aux nazis et autres racistes dits « scientifiques » du siècle dernier. Ynet ne précise pas la nature des examens génétiques prescrits par les rabbins, et qui permettraient, selon ces charlatans, de dire si un(e) individu est juif ou s’il ne l’est pas. • La Loi du Retour, adoptée peu après la proclamation d’Israël en 1948, accorde l’autorisation de s’installer dans le pays à toute personne ayant au moins un de ses 4 grands-parents reconnu par l’Etat comme juif. Traduction: CAPJPO-EuroPalestine Photo d'illustration: David Lau, le Grand rabbin ashkénaze d’Israël
----------------- Revealed : Rabbinate making Israelis undergo Jewish DNA test before being allowed to marry
New evidence shows chief rabbi demanding that citizens from former Soviet Union prove their Jewishness before they can marry; in some cases close relatives instructed to take tests as well; Lieberman demands chief rabbi resign immediately
Israel's rabbinate has been performing genetic testing on Israelis from the former Soviet Union, to check if they are “genetically Jewish” as a condition for marriage registration, an investigation by Ynet has revealed.
At least 20 couples have come forward after having been asked to undergo the procedure in the past year, according to a report published two weeks ago by the ITIM institute, which helps those having difficulty with “religious authorities’ bureaucracy in Israel.” Although the existence of such tests was initially denied by Interior Minister Aryeh Deri, Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi David Lau admitted to having requested that some couples prove their Jewish status. Lau claimed those were isolated incidents and there was no coercion. The testimonies of the couples obtained by Ynet, however, reveal that the complicated procedure was undertaken not only by the couples themselves but also by their relatives. In one instance, a young woman who went to the rabbinate before her wedding was asked to conduct a DNA test along with her mother and her aunt, in order to eliminate the possibility that her mother was adopted. The rabbinate apparently insisted on genetic testing partly because there was a significant delay in issuing a birth certificate for the woman’s mother. The young woman was told that if she refused the request, her marriage application would be denied. The rabbinate has control over Jewish religious rites in Israel. Another incident saw a man being put on a “delayed marriage” list after he withdrew his consent to conduct a DNA test, which the rabbinate had required due to what it said was inaccuracies in the documents proving his grandmother’s Jewishness. In a similar case, a young woman who’d been asked to prove her Jewish status, was requested by the rabbinical court to have both her and her mother undergo a DNA test that would include “the mitochondrial genome test,” in order to “ensure that the applicant is indeed her mother's biological offspring." They were instructed to carry out the test at the Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, and any attempt to find an alternative location to conduct the test—due to the ill mother’s inability to physically get to the hospital—had been refuted. According to the evidence accumulated by Ynet, these instances are examples of what appears to be a growing phenomenon where those applying to register for marriage, are being asked to undergo genetic testing if they want to have their requests granted. Yisrael Beiteinu Chairman Avigdor Lieberman, who on several occasions has accused the ultra-Orthodox establishment of discriminating against FSU immigrants, called the tests as “blatant racism and discrimination,” and urged Lau to “resign immediately.” "Unfortunately, there are immigrants who, despite their eligibility under the Law of Return, are not defined as Jews according to Halacha,” said Lau in response, referring to the Israeli law that allowed anyone with a Jewish grandparent to live in Israel. “In a few cases, there are those who claim to be Jews, but don’t possess the necessary documents to confirm it … or we find contradictions between their statements and what we would uncover about them." "In these cases we suggest undergoing DNA tests that would strengthen their claims," he said. "It’s never forced upon anyone and only used to assist applicants in the research process."
|